An epistle at the winter solstice

“In the beginning was the Logos, and the Logos was with God, and the Logos was God.” – John 1:1

“Through him all things were made; without him, nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of men. The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it. ” – John 1: 3-5

In the beginning, the enigmatic Johannine Apostle tells us, was the Logos—which for the ancient Greeks pervades the cosmos as its most fundamental and essential nature. The Logos is the primeval order of the cosmos, its secret law, its pristine constitution, what keeps it from the dark abyss of chaos and disorder.

For most of the ancient cultures, the order of nature was its beauty. From the east where the sun took birth each day, to the west where the sun perishes each day, only to be born again; the order of the firmaments lighting up and darkening each day in the cycles of day and night; the order among the star-strewn skies, for even though they seem so random, a secret order whispers life into their shines. Under the aegis of the pole star, they dance their eternal dances in their own constellations, the undying witnesses to the mortal tides and times. The endless cycle of the seasons: the golden fields of summer, the colors of autumn, the mystery of winter, the hope of spring. The order of the rivers, rushing towards oceans, ascending to the clouds, and returning as rain to the grateful and nourishing earth; the plants springing from the earth, reaching toward the light of the sun, and bearing with delight their fruits. The cycle of mortal life: the children playing happily in the fields, the youths and the maidens dancing in delight, the ages observing them in content silence. The order of their coming and perishing in their own times, the order of the body nourished by food and water, breathing its last, returning to the elements, in hopeful repose of rebirth and rejuvenation. Order was the flourishing of the cosmos. Logos was the undying cycle—the eternal recurring of the same—the highest law of the cosmos. This was not beautiful, no. Logos was beauty itself, thus held the ancient Greeks, and what was in accord with the Logos was accordingly beautiful. This Logos was divine—for it was apauruṣeya, not of mortal origin—for it preceded and exceeded man.

The winter solstice is a time of celebration for many cultures, ancient and modern. This is the time when the sun reaches its south-most zenith and the day is the shortest of the year. Thus, the solstice is the time for the celebration of the return of the light and the rebirth of the sun. In the ancient Roman empire, this was celebrated at the Saturnalia, the Dies Natalis (birthday) of Sol Invictus (the unconquerable sun). The Christian celebration of the birth of Christ was solemnized in the winter solstice during the reign of the ancient Roman Emperior Constantine, an institution which continues to this day. In the ancient Vedic cultures, the conception of the cosmos contained too the awareness of the solstices. The three worlds, bhuloka, bhuvarloka, and suvarloka (in later Sanskrit, svargaloka), were the dwellings of mortals on earth, of the forefathers in the lunar realm, and of the gods in the solar realm respectively. The cycle of day and night for the mortals was the interplay of sunrise and sunset on earth. But the cycle of day and night for the forefathers was the interplay of the waxing and waning of the moon; thus, one day of the forefathers was equal to a fortnight on earth. And for the gods, it was the inter-solsticial period when the sun made its annual journey from north to south and vice versa. The period between the winter solstice and the summer solstice is called the uttarāyaṇa, the time when the gods are awake, while the rest is dakṣiṇāyaṇa, when the gods are asleep.

Consciousness of this cosmology remains extant in Shaktism in Bengal where the worship of the goddess Durgā coincides with the two equinoxes: the Bāsantī puja during the vernal equinox and the Durgā puja during the autumn equinox. In the light of this, the reason behind why the latter is called an ‘untimely awakening’ (akāl-bodhan) festival becomes abundantly clear: since the festival takes place during dakṣiṇāyaṇa (when the gods are asleep), the goddess has first to be awakened untimely and propitiated for protection until the commencing of uttarāyaṇa. In the extant Upaniṣads, one finds the belief that after death, there are two possible routes for the spirit: the devayāna or uttaramārga (the way of the gods) which leads to suvarloka, wherefrom there is no return, and the pitṛyāna or dakṣiṇamārga (the way of the forefathers) which leads to the bhuvarloka, where the spirits reside in pale fogs, mists, and clouds lit up by the moon, awaiting their return to the earth. This motif is a probable precursor to the idea of saṃsāra (the cycle of rebirths) so ubiquitous today among the Dharmic religions. Interestingly, in the ancient Vedic thought, the sun was considered to be the highest gate to the unseen realms of the suvarloka; one enters this realm by ‘piercing through the solar gate’ (sauryaṃ dvāraṃ bhitvā). On earth, this gate manifests through fire (Agni), be it the sacrificial fire or the cremation fire; what is given to Agni is delivered to the unseen realm even as fire consumes what is transient.

The winter solstice has been a time of hope and longing for light, be it the light of the sun or that of wisdom. For in every present moment, there is the futurity of the promise of the time yet to come. We are forever coming to be and in existing, time remains for us; the phenomenological experience of time is pure advent. Man—the human condition—emerges here as the ontological site of hope.

Light, one must note, stands here as a multicultural metaphor for life, for without the light of Helios, there is no life on earth. The sun blesses the bountiful earth with harvest which we consume for our sustenance. Our bodies, nourished by these, is regulated through circadian rhythms which follows the patterns of light in our environment. To be, for the ancient Greeks, was ‘to stand in the light of Helios’, for light was what brought the unmanifest to manifest existence; indeed, of those who die, the Greek epics describe as ‘having left the light’. And deep underneath this celebration of light, there abides in the hearts of men, the dream of a realm of undying light. This is the realm which announces itself from within the chasms of the dark, to those who are attentive enough to hear it. As the Johannine Apostle imagines it, this is the light that shines in the darkness, even as the darkness fails to understand this light: this is the light of hope. This dream is not exclusive to the Johannine Gospel; for it is ingrained in the very fabric and innermost ground of human existence. Throughout the Abrahamic religions, there is speak of us mortals as the ‘children of light’, even as in the Bible, the revelation of a kingdom is received wherefrom night has perished. In the ancient Vedic texts, prayers are intermittently offered to Agni, to reveal that imperishable realm of light, where dwells the Ṛgvedic Vishnu, famed for three wide strides, the first upon earth, the second upon the firmaments, and the third upon ‘the realm unseen‘ (tad vishnoḥ paramaṃ padaṃ). The Vedic bards offer prayers to Agni, ‘the immortal light among mortals’, whose hiding in the darkness is feared by the gods (RV 6.9); to Soma, he prays for immortality in the third heaven, ‘where the worlds are made of light‘, ‘where the inextinguishable light shines, the world where the sun was placed, in that immortal, unfading world‘ (RV 9.113). In sum, this time of the year has always been a most auspicious time, a time for hope for rebirth, for renewal and rejuvenation, for light and for life. The celebration during the winter solstice is one that hopes for everything that mankind has always held dear: health, long life and prosperity. This is the life-affirming and joyous celebration of human existence.

॥ উত্তরায়ণারম্ভ শুভায় ভবতু ॥

Post-truth politics—what rubbish?

‘Post-truth’ is the Oxford Dictionaries Word of Year 2016. Fancy that, but what does it mean?

Post-truth, adjective, ‘relating to or denoting circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than appeals to emotion and personal belief’.

More than being the OED’s ‘Word of the Year’, what is more significant is that it is ‘the Word’ of this year, 2016. It is a word that is being crowned ‘in the context of the EU referendum in the United Kingdom and the presidential election in the United States’ and also because it has ‘become associated with a particular noun, in the phrase post-truth politics’ [1]. Even fancier, but can we look at it a bit closer?

The Economist tweeted [2] a short and witty primer: “Obama founded ISIS. George Bush was behind 9/11. Welcome to post-truth politics.” In coining the term, David Roberts [3] explained that it runs somewhat counter to ‘the idealized Enlightenment view’ that voters gather facts, then draw conclusions from those facts, choose issue positions based on those conclusions and then back the political party that champions those issues. He points out that the political sciences have revealed a different story: that voters choose a party or tribe based on value affiliations, adopt the issue positions of the tribe, develop arguments to support those positions, and choose facts to bolster those arguments. Post-truth politics, then, refers to a political culture in which ‘politics (public opinion and media narratives) have become almost entirely disconnected from legislative policy’ which ‘dims any hope of reasoned legislative compromise’. It doesn’t matter, he says, if a party in power adopts a policy supported by the opposition a year ago; the opposition opposes for the sake of opposition alone.

In this day and age, we cannot deny the accuracy of this assessment. This is politics; but is it modern politics? To be more specific, is post-truth politics a novelty that has manifested in the political developments of 2016, notably Brexit and Trump? That, on the other hand, would be pure rubbish.

Shortly after the Trump victory and the Democratic reaction, a video of British satirist Jonathan Pie (Tom Walker) went viral on Facebook. In his characteristic and brutal rant, he lashes out at the Left/Liberal Establishment for its fundamentalist behaviors that came to the fore during the dramatic US elections. He points out how the ‘blaming and shaming’ by the Left has exposed its intellectual poverty, how it has lost the art of respecting (and trying to persuade) those who think differently.

“Trump won […] because the Left has decided that any other way of looking at the world is unacceptable. […] If you’re on the right, it means you’re a freak, you’re evil, you’re a racist, you’re sexist, you’re stupid, you’re a basket of deplorables. […] Not everyone who voted for Trump is a racist or a sexist. […] Stop labelling people just because they disagree with you.”

This left-leaning extremism (under the guise of ‘liberalism’), where anything not conforming to the perceived ‘progressive and liberal’ order of things must be vilified and demonized, blamed for all inequities and cursed to suffer is nothing new. The conservative philosopher Roger Scruton has argued that labels are fundamental to Leftist thought—fueled by the need to identify certain groups (‘bourgeoisie’, etc.) who are somehow made out to be ‘responsible’ for social inequities—stigmatizing the ‘enemy’ and justifying their expulsion. Anything can then be done in the name of justice; but when the conservative seeks to prevent something, one can be sure that it is not from ‘moral conviction’, but from ‘indignation, intolerance and disgust’.

“[…] By a relentless campaign of intimidation, left-wing thinkers have sought to make it unacceptable to be on the right. […] Once identified as right-wing, you are beyond the pale of argument; your views are irrelevant, your character discredited, your presence in the world a mistake. You are not an opponent to be argued with, but a disease to be shunned.” — Roger Scruton

This is what creates a ‘bubble’, which hides the too-ugly-to-face reality and within which we remain confined to: namely, that it is, in fact, too uncomfortably similar to the ‘negative forces’ (the conservatives and the reactionaries) that it purportedly struggles against in the name of an ever-elusive ‘social justice’. In claiming a higher moral ground where none exists, in championing a superior political order where ‘superior’ is always conveniently and unrealistically defined, in creating an elite within a purported egalitarianism, and in refusing to accord dissenters the respect that it so demands from those dissenters, it exposes its fundamental hypocrisy and shameless pretentiousness.

The appointment of ‘post-truth’ as the Word of the Year 2016 by Oxford Dictionaries is—to borrow a phrase from the British comedy Yes, Prime Minister—the Left/Liberal Establishment ‘at play’. By being linked to political developments like Brexit (UK) and Trump (USA) as well as with Marine LePen (France), Geert Wilders (Netherlands) and the AfD (Germany), ‘post-truth’ is now the newest label. Assessing reactions from Europeans leaders to the presidential victory of Donald Trump, The Telegraph laments [5] that the European liberal establishmentthe ‘liberal ancien regimes’ of todaymust ‘learn humility and stop bashing Donald Trump’, but the message appears to have been wasted on us.

Yet ‘post-truth’ is no innovation for the Left is no stranger to it. Where was post-truth when the thinkers of the New Left forged the grand narratives in which social inequalities, wars, genocides were attributed to designated groups of people and inter-group struggles? Where was post-truth when totalitarian dictatorships rode in with utopian visions of ‘classless societies’ fueled by the fundamentalist zeal to seize and redistribute the assets of society in accordance with a ‘plan’ and bring about a fabled ’emancipation’ through a ‘revolutionary working class’ united with ‘intellectuals’? No figure stands taller than the venerable Karl Marx himself when it comes to making politics indifferent to truth by elevating it to the lofty realms of metaphysics, safely beyond the paltry reaches of facts and figures. Where was post-truth when simple categories were blown out of proportion at the expense of historical complexity and all history hitherto was declared ipso facto to be ‘the history of class struggles’?

The implied conflation of ‘post-truth’ and ‘right-wing’ is a last-ditch attempt by a belligerent elite purportedly committed to egalitarianism yet desperate to cling on to its intellectual privilege and remain in the corridors of power. But the chasm between these ‘pro-prole posers’ (the proletariat-championing leftists) and the actual working class have simply become too big to ignore [7,8]. The idea of a ‘planned’ society has always attracted intellectuals, Roger Scruton noted [6], as long as they believe they will remain in charge of it, but now the ‘snob-rule of the few’ stands threatened by the ‘mob-rule of the many’.

Post-truth has become the new ‘sour grapes’. Grappled with the rising political challenges and defeats like Brexit and Trump, the despair has become too much to bear, the reality has become too unreal to face—unworthy of being truth any longer. Truth must now re-defined: what we did was truth, what they’re doing is post-truth. Truth must no longer legitimize the politics of Brexit and Trump, it’s not allowed to. No matter how democratic it is, the rug must be pulled out from under. We have lost our power to them; we cannot lose our truth too. So much for democracy.

Post-truth politics is real, but there is nothing new about it. The political right has never had a monopoly on it, for the Left has long mastered the subtle art of post-truth.

Notes

1. Oxford Dictionaries. Word of the Year 2016. November 8, 2016. (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-2016)

2.The Economist. The art of the lie. September 10, 2016. (http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21706525-politicians-have-always-lied-does-it-matter-if-they-leave-truth-behind-entirely-art)

3. Grist. David Roberts. Post-truth politics. April 1st, 2010. (https://grist.org/article/2010-03-30-post-truth-politics/)

4. Jonathan Pie. President Trump: How and Why. November 10, 2016. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLG9g7BcjKs)

5. The Telegraph. Peter Foster. Europe’s liberal establishment must learn some humility and stop bashing Donald Trump – or face an American backlash. November 14, 2016. (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/14/European-liberal-establishment-must-learn-humility-in-new-era-of-president-donald-trump/)

6. Roger Scruton. Fools, frauds and firebrands. Thinkers of the New Left. London: Bloomsbury. 2015 (originally published in 1985).

7. Spiked. Tom Slater. Remain: The Left has lined up with the Establishment. June 22, 2016. (http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/remain-the-left-has-lined-up-with-the-establishment-eu-brexit/18483#.WDSN1fl97IV)

8. The Guardian. Paul Mason. Brexit is a fake revolt – Working class culture is being hijacked to help the elite. June 20, 2016. (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/20/brexit-fake-revolt-eu-working-class-culture-hijacked-help-elite)

Untitled Verses, #5

হে প্রিয়তম, বেঁধো না তব তরী মম হতাশ তীরে।
যাও তবে, চিরসখা, সানন্দে, জীবনস্রোতে, সুখের খোঁজে।
হতভাগ্য বাস হতে—অনাসন্ন প্রাণ অম্বরে—করো গমন॥

Rest not the boat of your life upon my desolate shores;
Go now, eternal friend, upon the waves of life, in pursuit of your happiness.
From these forsaken abodes— into the unhindered openness of life— be free!

For S. N.― প্রেমের প্রত‍্যাহার
Bardhaman, Āśvina Śuklā Tṛtīyā.
The 4th of October in 2016.

Untitled Verses, #4

যাও তবে সখা দূর-দূরান্তে উড়ে—
প্রেমের বাঁধনে যে ধরেছে ভাঙ্গন
স্নেহের শিকড় যে গেছে উপড়ে॥

রাখিতে যে নাহি পারলাম তোমায়
সকলি বাসনার যে হলো বিসর্জন—
ঘর আমার আজি শূন‍্য যে হায়
কি করিব আমি বড় যে নিরুপায়॥

তবুও জীর্ণ হৃদয় কক্ষে আশা
র‌য়ে গেলো ‌কোমল স্মৃতি মাঝে—
হতভাগ‍্য আমি র‌ইবো এতেই তুষ্ট॥

For S. N.― বিদায়গীৎ
Bardhaman, Āśvina Kṛṣṇā Tṛtīyā.
The 19th of September in 2016.

Untitled Verses, #2

A gloom has fallen.
Dark, these corridors.
Deathly silence speaks.
A distant ray gleams.
A forlorn sense of hope.
I’m lost without you.
I’m lost without you.

What slumber encumbers?
What pain inflames?
The love that is born.

Its sufferings tragic.

Bring me peace tonight.
Bring me the warmth.
A deserted fort beckons.
Broken doors open.
Come home tonight.
I’m lost without you.

I’m lost without you.

Cold stones paved.
Water shivers down.
Words billow like leaves.
Music flows like rivers.

Into the droughts of the heart.

An empty bed.
An empty room.
A ghost slumbers away.
A lost soul, a broken heart.

No warmth now remains.

Come home tonight.
My lips are parched.
The waters of your love.

Freely and willingly, pour.

Come home tonight.
My desire hungers.
The shivers of your body.

Freely and willingly, give.

Here is the path.
It leads to home.
Under the stars.

Serene and blissful.

Guard this home.
A fire, light above.
A wandering traveller.

Lost, now I long to be found.

Stay, love, do not leave.
This is my heart.
Poor and wretched.

All misery and pain.

Stay, love, do not leave.
Love, begs the beggar.
Coins strewn on stone.

So worthless and so vile.

I’m lost without you.
I’m lost without you.
O guiding star!
Gentle and kind.
Soul of my body.

Leave me not.

A faltering hand.
Beckons you here.
O my ever-strong love!

Hither, approach.

Here is the tomb.
Here lies my heart.
Sing, O sing, my love.

Bring me back to life.

To thee, I give.
Body and soul.
To hold and to cherish.
For richer or for poorer.
In sickness and in health.

Till death do us part.

For S. N.―
Bardhaman, Vaiśākha Śukla Caturthī.
The 10th of May in 2016.